Dq Conformance Result List
Get a list of DQConformanceResult objects.
GET /api/v3/dqconformanceresults/?format=api&offset=4300
{ "count": 4594, "next": "https://api.catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/api/v3/dqconformanceresults/?format=api&limit=100&offset=4400", "previous": "https://api.catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/api/v3/dqconformanceresults/?format=api&limit=100&offset=4200", "results": [ { "ob_id": 4518, "explanation": "The data are supplied as-is with no quality control applied by Centre for Environmental Data Analysis", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-01-31" }, { "ob_id": 4519, "explanation": "The data produced were compared with previously published values and those derived from weather stations.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "Met Office Wind-driven rain data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-01" }, { "ob_id": 4520, "explanation": "Data are as given by the data provider, no quality control has been performed by the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-02" }, { "ob_id": 4521, "explanation": "The satellite-based estimates of phytoplankton carbon are consistent with in situ data (Figure 7, Sathyendranath et al. 2020) and the theoretical model used to generate the products compared well with results from earlier published empirical models (Figure 8, Sathyendranath et al. 2020). Further details are provided in Sathyendranath et al. (2020).\r\n\r\nSathyendranath, S.; Platt, T.; Kovač, Ž.; Dingle, J.; Jackson, T.; Brewin, R.J.W.; Franks, P.; Marañón, E.; Kulk, G.; Bouman, H.A. Reconciling models of primary production and photoacclimation. Applies Optics, 2020, 59, C100. doi.org/10.1364/AO.386252", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-06" }, { "ob_id": 4522, "explanation": "The satellite-based estimates of phytoplankton carbon are consistent with in situ data (Figure 7, Sathyendranath et al. 2020) and the theoretical model used to generate the products compared well with results from earlier published empirical models (Figure 8, Sathyendranath et al. 2020). Further details are provided in Sathyendranath et al. (2020).\r\n\r\nSathyendranath, S.; Platt, T.; Kovač, Ž.; Dingle, J.; Jackson, T.; Brewin, R.J.W.; Franks, P.; Marañón, E.; Kulk, G.; Bouman, H.A. Reconciling models of primary production and photoacclimation. Applies Optics, 2020, 59, C100. doi.org/10.1364/AO.386252", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-06" }, { "ob_id": 4523, "explanation": "The satellite-based estimates of phytoplankton carbon are consistent with in situ data (Figure 7, Sathyendranath et al. 2020) and the theoretical model used to generate the products compared well with results from earlier published empirical models (Figure 8, Sathyendranath et al. 2020). Further details are provided in Sathyendranath et al. (2020).\r\n\r\nSathyendranath, S.; Platt, T.; Kovač, Ž.; Dingle, J.; Jackson, T.; Brewin, R.J.W.; Franks, P.; Marañón, E.; Kulk, G.; Bouman, H.A. Reconciling models of primary production and photoacclimation. Applies Optics, 2020, 59, C100. doi.org/10.1364/AO.386252", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-06" }, { "ob_id": 4524, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the related documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-09" }, { "ob_id": 4525, "explanation": "Data are as supplied by the project team. No quality testing undertaken by CEDA", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-10" }, { "ob_id": 4526, "explanation": "Research data as provided by project team", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-13" }, { "ob_id": 4527, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the related documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-22" }, { "ob_id": 4528, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the related documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-22" }, { "ob_id": 4529, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the related documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-22" }, { "ob_id": 4530, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the related documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-22" }, { "ob_id": 4531, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the related documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-22" }, { "ob_id": 4532, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the related documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-22" }, { "ob_id": 4533, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the related documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-22" }, { "ob_id": 4534, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the related documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-22" }, { "ob_id": 4535, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-23" }, { "ob_id": 4536, "explanation": "The data is calibrated and scaled on a monthly basis using a baseline 0 and span from the internal O3 generator. The instrument is audited every 6 months. If the scaled and audited O3 level falls below 0 or above 150 ppb the data is flagged as suspect and is excluded.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-02-27" }, { "ob_id": 4537, "explanation": "-", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-03-04" }, { "ob_id": 4538, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-03-04" }, { "ob_id": 4539, "explanation": "Data has been produced from Met Office outputs via Python Iris version 3.7", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-03-05" }, { "ob_id": 4540, "explanation": "please see accompanying paper for uncertainty analysis", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-03-07" }, { "ob_id": 4542, "explanation": "A consistent naming convention for variables, directories, and file names across all models is applied to simplify the comparison of different models and to allow a scripted analysis of the entire database. The list of output variables is a modified version of those proposed in the DeepMIP experimental design. Variable names, units and signs of fluxes follow the naming convention of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) data request. Consistent standard names, long names and global attributes are added to the netCDF files following the Climate and Forecast metadata conventions (CF) in version 1.8. All netCDF file have been automatically tested for CF-compliance with the cf-checker utility (https://github.com/cedadev/cf-checker) A z-score for the global mean, minimum and maximum for each model and variable relative to the ensemble median is calcluated to identify outliers.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-03-07" }, { "ob_id": 4543, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-03-12" }, { "ob_id": 4544, "explanation": "These simulations have been developed over a number of years and had code reviews performed to ensure the coding standard used. All code developments have since been committed to the UM and UKCA trunks for use by the community.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-03-15" }, { "ob_id": 4546, "explanation": "The quality of this dataset is the same as the quality of the core FAAM data that was used to produce it", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-03-15" }, { "ob_id": 4547, "explanation": "I make no promises for the quality of this data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-03-20" }, { "ob_id": 4552, "explanation": "For information on data quality see the linked Product Validation and Intercomparison report (PVIR) and the Climate Assessment Report (CAR)", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CCI SST v3", "date": "2024-04-04" }, { "ob_id": 4555, "explanation": "Time series of daily mean river flows (m3s-1) are provided in csv format for 626 English gauging stations, and gridded flows are provided in NetCDF format for the period 1st December 1980 to 30th November 2080. The netcdf format data have been checked for CF convention compliance.\r\n\r\nGridded flow estimates are provided for 2 spatial domains:\r\n(i) The gridded data for the NATURAL flows are provided for Great Britain: this is a 601 km × 980 km spatial domain on the British National Grid from lower left corner (55000, 0) to top right (656000, 980000) metres. \r\n(ii) The gridded data for the AI impacted flows are provided for England: this is a smaller 601 km × 660 km spatial domain on the British National Grid from lower left corner (55000, 0) to top right (656000, 660000) metres. \r\nValues for each 1 km × 1 km grid box refer to the river which best represents the 1 km cell.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-04-11" }, { "ob_id": 4556, "explanation": "These data are produced to operational standards at the Met Office.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-04-17" }, { "ob_id": 4558, "explanation": "These data are produced to operational standards at the Met Office.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-04-17" }, { "ob_id": 4559, "explanation": "These data are produced to operational standards at the Met Office.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-04-17" }, { "ob_id": 4560, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-04-24" }, { "ob_id": 4561, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-04-26" }, { "ob_id": 4562, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-05-14" }, { "ob_id": 4563, "explanation": "Only catchments that scored Nash Sutcliffe Efficiencies greater than equal to 0.7 are included in the analysis.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-05-16" }, { "ob_id": 4565, "explanation": "All catchment models were calibrated and validated against historical flows. Only those with Nash Sutcliffe Efficiencies greater than equal to 0.7 were included in subsequent analysis.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-05-16" }, { "ob_id": 4566, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-05-21" }, { "ob_id": 4567, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-05-28" }, { "ob_id": 4568, "explanation": "These data have been produced in accordance to standard NCAS observational practices. This includes instrument calibration and compliance checking of data against the NCAS Data Standards.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "NCAS Standard Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-06-07" }, { "ob_id": 4569, "explanation": "See the linked documentation and Obs4MIPs tech note for further information", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-06-11" }, { "ob_id": 4571, "explanation": "Model output has only been checked for CF convention compliance, otherwise supplied as-is.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-06-17" }, { "ob_id": 4574, "explanation": "The modelled pollutant concentration is evaluated using the UK Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN) monitoring stations (https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/networks/network-info?view=aurn) R was used to access the AURN dataset to evaluate the EMEP4UK model output.\r\n\r\nYour use of the content of this dataset is entirely at your own risk. We make no warranty or guarantee that the content is error free or fit for your intended use.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-06-17" }, { "ob_id": 4575, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-06-21" }, { "ob_id": 4576, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-06-21" }, { "ob_id": 4577, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-06-21" }, { "ob_id": 4578, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-06-21" }, { "ob_id": 4579, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-07-01" }, { "ob_id": 4580, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the project documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-07-02" }, { "ob_id": 4581, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-07-03" }, { "ob_id": 4582, "explanation": "test", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-07-23" }, { "ob_id": 4583, "explanation": "more qc", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-07-25" }, { "ob_id": 4585, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-07-26" }, { "ob_id": 4586, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-07-30" }, { "ob_id": 4587, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-07-30" }, { "ob_id": 4588, "explanation": "Data are as given by the data provider, no quality control has been performed by the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "Standard CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-07-31" }, { "ob_id": 4589, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-08-06" }, { "ob_id": 4590, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-08-06" }, { "ob_id": 4591, "explanation": "NA", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-08-09" }, { "ob_id": 4592, "explanation": "Data are as given by the data provider, no quality control has been performed by the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-08-28" }, { "ob_id": 4593, "explanation": "Data are as given by the data provider, no quality control has been performed by the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-08-28" }, { "ob_id": 4594, "explanation": "Data are as given by the data provider, no quality control has been performed by the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-08-29" }, { "ob_id": 4595, "explanation": "The model data files follow COARDS NetCDF Conventions. No other quality standards were used.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-08-29" }, { "ob_id": 4596, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-09-10" }, { "ob_id": 4597, "explanation": "The datasets consist of files of the spatial distributions of 1 km × 1 km resolution groundwater (GW), surface water (SW) and tidal water (TW) points actively abstracting at any period during the years between 1999 and 2014, a 5-year mean from 2010 to 2014, and active discharges during 2017, together with the locations of Hands-off Flow (HoF) conditions in 2022.\r\n\r\nThe gridded NetCDF file data are provided for England only: this is a 601 km × 660 km spatial domain on the British National Grid from the lower left corner (55000, 0) to the top right (656000, 660000) metres. The England region was delineated using the Local Authority Districts Boundaries UK BFC shapefile (December 2023: www.data.gov.uk)", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-09-10" }, { "ob_id": 4598, "explanation": "The dataset is as provided by the data provider.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-09-17" }, { "ob_id": 4599, "explanation": "The datase", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-09-17" }, { "ob_id": 4600, "explanation": "The dataset is as provided by the data provider.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-09-17" }, { "ob_id": 4601, "explanation": "The dataset is as provided by the data provider.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-09-17" }, { "ob_id": 4602, "explanation": "Data are as provided by the data producer", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-09-18" }, { "ob_id": 4604, "explanation": "Spurious data have been removed. These relate to (a) instrument error, (2) sea-ice affected soundings, (3) failure of the retrieval to converge or (4) where the mismatch between the model fitted and observed brightness temperature exceeded 2 K.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-10-09" }, { "ob_id": 4605, "explanation": "For information on data quality see the project documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CCI generic", "date": "2024-10-09" }, { "ob_id": 4606, "explanation": "No information provided - see McLaren et al. , 2025: Implementation of Water Tracers in the Met Office Unified Model", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-10-14" }, { "ob_id": 4607, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-10-16" }, { "ob_id": 4609, "explanation": "See Wainman et al., 2024 for a discussion of data screening and processing.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-10-19" }, { "ob_id": 4610, "explanation": "See the associated dataset documentation at https://climate.esa.int/projects/fire/key-documents/", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-10-24" }, { "ob_id": 4613, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-10-30" }, { "ob_id": 4616, "explanation": "To be completed by the author", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-11-05" }, { "ob_id": 4617, "explanation": "To be completed by the author...", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-11-05" }, { "ob_id": 4618, "explanation": "To be completed by the author", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-11-05" }, { "ob_id": 4619, "explanation": "Algorithms used to derive water quality variables from atmospherically corrected Sentinel-2 MSI imagery are described in Warren et al. (2021). The described procedure align the products derived from Sentinel-2 MSI with corresponding imagery obtained by Sentinel-3 OLCI. However, application to (very) small bodies of water is likely to see degradation of product quality. \r\n\r\nThe data contained in this record have not been quality masked although several product quality flag sets are included. These data are intended for expert use. They will require additional quality masking, taking into account the challenges of observing water quality over (very) small bodies of water. \r\n\r\nReferences\r\nWarren et al. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112651", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-11-12" }, { "ob_id": 4620, "explanation": "Model simulations were double-check by co-authors during the simulation process.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-11-13" }, { "ob_id": 4621, "explanation": "For information on the data quality see the related documentation", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "EOCIS - see docs", "date": "2024-11-22" }, { "ob_id": 4622, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-11-22" }, { "ob_id": 4623, "explanation": "Data are as given by the data provider, no quality control has been performed by the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-11-26" }, { "ob_id": 4626, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-12-09" }, { "ob_id": 4627, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-12-09" }, { "ob_id": 4628, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-12-09" }, { "ob_id": 4629, "explanation": "For further details see documentation.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-12-09" }, { "ob_id": 4630, "explanation": "Sea ice freeboard (and derived thickness) is only reliably measured from satellite radar altimetry during the winter months. During summer, melt ponds can form on the sea ice floes making it difficult for the satellite to differentiate between floes and leads, and hence calculate sea ice freeboard (and subsequently thickness). Measurement during summer months using radar altimetry is an area of active research (Landy et al, 2022) but is not yet operationally processed.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "EOCIS sea ice timeseries", "date": "2024-12-09" }, { "ob_id": 4631, "explanation": "Sea ice freeboard (and derived thickness) is only reliably measured from satellite radar altimetry during the winter months. During summer, melt ponds can form on the sea ice floes making it difficult for the satellite to differentiate between floes and leads, and hence calculate sea ice freeboard (and subsequently thickness). Measurement during summer months using radar altimetry is an area of active research (Landy et al, 2022) but is not yet operationally processed.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "EOCIS sea ice thickness", "date": "2024-12-09" }, { "ob_id": 4632, "explanation": "to be added", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-12-12" }, { "ob_id": 4634, "explanation": "Data are as provided by the data producer. For further information on the data quality see the associated documentation.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "LST EOCIS", "date": "2024-12-19" }, { "ob_id": 4635, "explanation": "Guidelines on Best Practices for Climate Data Rescue published by World Meteorological Organization (WMO) were followed during the rescuing weather observations (WMO, 2016).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2024-12-20" }, { "ob_id": 4636, "explanation": "Data were checked to ensure correct instrument operating conditions (e.g., sufficient flows, voltages, pressures)", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-01-06" }, { "ob_id": 4637, "explanation": "Quality information can be found in the following document: \r\nhttps://eocis.org/portal/documents/IEA-EOCISAuxfiles-TR_Additional_v8.pdf", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-01-09" }, { "ob_id": 4638, "explanation": "See attached documentation.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "EOCIS land vegetation", "date": "2025-01-09" }, { "ob_id": 4641, "explanation": "The soil moisture variables are suitable for both operational and research applications.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-01-17" }, { "ob_id": 4642, "explanation": "Gas standards for isoprene and DMS were prepared gravimetrically by diluting higher concentration parent mixtures (respectively 104 ± 5.2 and 106 ± 5.3 nmol mol−1 in nitrogen, BOC) to 4.6 and 12 nmol mol−1 respectively, with high-purity nitrogen (BIP+, Air Products), inside Silconert2000-treated stainless steel cylinders (RE24133-PI 500 mL sample cylinder, Thames Restek).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-01-18" } ] }