Dq Conformance Result List
Get a list of DQConformanceResult objects.
GET /api/v3/dqconformanceresults/?format=api&offset=4500
{ "count": 4594, "next": null, "previous": "https://api.catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/api/v3/dqconformanceresults/?format=api&limit=100&offset=4400", "results": [ { "ob_id": 4759, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-07-21" }, { "ob_id": 4760, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-07-21" }, { "ob_id": 4761, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-07-21" }, { "ob_id": 4762, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-07-23" }, { "ob_id": 4763, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-07-23" }, { "ob_id": 4764, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-07-23" }, { "ob_id": 4765, "explanation": "The dataset was created by Liam J. Berrisford at the University of Exeter during his PhD studies, supported by the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Centre for Doctoral Training in Environmental Intelligence. Full methodological details and data validation information are available in the associated open-access scientific publication. For more information about the data, see the README.md archived alongside this dataset.\r\n\r\nThis dataset provides hourly predictions of air pollution concentrations for the globe throughout the year 2022. These values are not direct measurements from monitoring stations but rather model-based estimates generated using a supervised machine-learning approach. The model was trained using real observations from the OpenAQ monitoring network, but it is capable of making predictions even in areas without any nearby monitoring stations. This means that the dataset offers complete spatial and temporal coverage, filling in gaps where no sensor data exists.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-07-23" }, { "ob_id": 4766, "explanation": "The data contain gaps where there were instrument outages and when the aerosol samplers were turned off during helicopter activity.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-07-25" }, { "ob_id": 4768, "explanation": "Data are as supplied by the project team. No quality conformance has been applied by CEDA", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-01" }, { "ob_id": 4769, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-05" }, { "ob_id": 4770, "explanation": "Data have been produced in accordance with standard Met Office observational practices. To ensure optimal traceability and transparency of data, comprehensive metadata is included.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "MetOfficeWesCon Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-05" }, { "ob_id": 4771, "explanation": "The AVHRR L1C FCDR data produced by the ESA CCI SST project were used as inputs. These data are processed by the University of Leicester: data are reformatted then processed to LSTs on an orbit swath, regridded to an equal angle grid, and collated to daily ascending and descending products at Level 3C.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CCI LST - AVHRR NOAA", "date": "2025-08-06" }, { "ob_id": 4772, "explanation": "Manual snow density measurements were made using American Avalanche Association standards from Snow, Weather, and Avalanche Guidelines, 4th Edition, 2022. They were cross-referenced against concurrent permittivity-based snow density measurements.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-06" }, { "ob_id": 4773, "explanation": "All measurements were made in alignment with FPGA SnowPro User Manual, v2. Measurements were referenced against coincident manual snow density measurements.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-07" }, { "ob_id": 4774, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-08" }, { "ob_id": 4775, "explanation": "Some spatial variability was apparent in snow properties based on unpublished compression strength measurements. Layer ID has vertical resolution of +/- 0.5 cm (1-sigma). Snow grains > 0.5 mm in diameter were recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm, otherwise very fine grains recorded as 0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 mm.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-08" }, { "ob_id": 4776, "explanation": "Some spatial variability was apparent in snow properties based on unpublished compression strength measurements. Uncertainty in max force values were +/- 4 N, 1-sigma. Uncertainty in shear frame area is 0.01 cm2, 1-sigma.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-08" }, { "ob_id": 4777, "explanation": "All measurements were made in alignment with FPGA Infrasnow User Manual. Some spatial variability was apparent in snow properties based on unpublished compression strength measurements. Unevenness in the snow pit face will allow a variable but small amount of side-light into the measurement causing a variable but small low bias in these measurements.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-08" }, { "ob_id": 4778, "explanation": "Manual snow density measurements were made using American Avalanche Association standards from Snow, Weather, and Avalanche Guidelines, 4th Edition, 2022. They were cross-referenced against concurrent permittivity-based snow density measurements. Some spatial variability was apparent in snow properties based on concurrent, unpublished snow density measurements.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-11" }, { "ob_id": 4779, "explanation": "All measurements were made in alignment with FPGA SnowPro User Manual, v2. Some spatial variability was apparent in snow properties based on unpublished compression strength measurements. There may have been air gaps between the SnowPro-17 and the snow pit face, resulting in a small low bias in these measurements. Measurements were made only in dry snow.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-11" }, { "ob_id": 4780, "explanation": "Some spatial variability was apparent in snow properties based on unpublished compression strength measurements. Layer ID has vertical resolution of +/- 0.5 cm (1-sigma).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-11" }, { "ob_id": 4781, "explanation": "Some spatial variability was apparent in snow properties based on unpublished compression strength measurements.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-11" }, { "ob_id": 4782, "explanation": "All measurements were made in alignment with FPGA Infrasnow User Manual. Some spatial variability was apparent in snow properties based on unpublished compression strength measurements. Unevenness in the snow pit face will allow a variable but small amount of side-light into the measurement causing a variable but small low bias in these measurements.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-11" }, { "ob_id": 4783, "explanation": "Data are as given by the data provider, no quality control has been performed by the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-12" }, { "ob_id": 4784, "explanation": "", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-14" }, { "ob_id": 4786, "explanation": "Data is scaled and ratified using regular quality checks undertaken by the operator, and using data from independent audit.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-21" }, { "ob_id": 4787, "explanation": "During the DY151 cruise, data collection followed established scientific protocols for atmospheric measurements, including regular calibration of instruments and routine checks for accuracy and consistency.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-25" }, { "ob_id": 4788, "explanation": "During the DY151 cruise, data collection followed established scientific protocols for atmospheric measurements, including regular calibration of instruments and routine checks for accuracy and consistency.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-08-25" }, { "ob_id": 4790, "explanation": "CMOR rewrote data to be consistent with activity_id, and CF conventions standards", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-04" }, { "ob_id": 4791, "explanation": "CMORized to adhere to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS 2.5, while still remaining compatible with ILAMB software. The file naming convention was modeled after obs4MIPs data on the ESGF Metagrid.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-04" }, { "ob_id": 4795, "explanation": "CMORized to adhere to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS 2.5, while still remaining compatible with ILAMB software. The file naming convention was modelled after obs4MIPs data in ESGF Metagrid.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-09" }, { "ob_id": 4796, "explanation": "CMORized to adhere to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS 2.5, while still remaining compatible with ILAMB software. The file naming convention was modelled after obs4MIPs data in ESGF Metagrid.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-09" }, { "ob_id": 4797, "explanation": "CMORized to adhere to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS 2.5, while still remaining compatible with ILAMB software. The file naming convention was modelled after obs4MIPs data in ESGF Metagrid.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-09" }, { "ob_id": 4799, "explanation": "CMORized to adhere to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS 2.5, while still remaining compatible with ILAMB software. The file naming convention was modleled after obs4MIPs data sitting in Metagrid.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-09" }, { "ob_id": 4800, "explanation": "CMORised to adhere to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS 2.5, while still remaining compatible with ILAMB software. The file naming convention was modelled after obs4MIPs data in ESGF Metagrid.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-09" }, { "ob_id": 4801, "explanation": "CMORised to adhere to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS 2.5, while still remaining compatible with ILAMB software. The file naming convention was modelled after obs4MIPs data in ESGF Metagrid.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-09" }, { "ob_id": 4802, "explanation": "CMORised to adhere to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS 2.5. File naming convention follows obs4MIPs data on the ESGF Metagrid.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-11" }, { "ob_id": 4803, "explanation": "Data are as given by the data provider, no quality control has been perform ed by the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA)", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-17" }, { "ob_id": 4804, "explanation": "Data quality as supplied by the project team. No quality checks have been carried out by CEDA.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-23" }, { "ob_id": 4805, "explanation": "The L3 were validated against independent groud-based NO2 measurements (Glissenaar et al., 2025).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-09-29" }, { "ob_id": 4806, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-06" }, { "ob_id": 4807, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-06" }, { "ob_id": 4808, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-06" }, { "ob_id": 4809, "explanation": "2025-10-08 CMOR rewrote data to be consistent with obs4MIPs, and CF-1.11; ODS-2.5 standards", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-09" }, { "ob_id": 4810, "explanation": "Model simulations were double-check by co-authors during the simulation process.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-09" }, { "ob_id": 4811, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-10" }, { "ob_id": 4812, "explanation": "Cf. references", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-10" }, { "ob_id": 4814, "explanation": "CMORised to adhere to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS 2.5. File naming convention follows obs4MIPs data on the ESGF Metagrid.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-13" }, { "ob_id": 4816, "explanation": "Model output has only been checked for CF convention compliance, otherwise supplied as-is, organised by variable.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-14" }, { "ob_id": 4817, "explanation": "Data downloaded directly from the Copernicus Land Monitoring Service for archival", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-16" }, { "ob_id": 4818, "explanation": "The GLAMOUR dataset is derived from open-source Sentinel imagery that captures the average building height and footprint at a resolution of 0.0009° across urbanized areas worldwide. Validated in 18 cities, GLAMOUR exhibits superior accuracy with median root mean square errors of 7.5 m and 0.14 for building height and footprint estimations, indicating better overall performance against existing published datasets.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-23" }, { "ob_id": 4819, "explanation": "CMORised to adhere to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS 2.6, while still remaining compatible with ILAMB software.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-10-30" }, { "ob_id": 4820, "explanation": "The quality of this dataset is ensured through a multi-stage validation process. The underlying WACCM-X simulations were first benchmarked against historical thermospheric density trends (2000–2020) to ensure physical accuracy. Each scaling factor was then screened for mathematical consistency across the full range of altitudes (100–1,000 km) and solar flux conditions. The data has been peer-reviewed by the SWIMMR-T consortium to confirm its suitability for long-term orbital decay and space debris modelling", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement - SWIMMR", "date": "2025-11-06" }, { "ob_id": 4823, "explanation": "This is a prototype. The information in this product is high-quality and has been subject to a rigorous quality assurance process. However, the form of the product and how it is published are subject to change.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-11-14" }, { "ob_id": 4824, "explanation": "This is a prototype. The information in this product is high-quality and has been subject to a rigorous quality assurance process. However, the form of the product and how it is published are subject to change.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-11-14" }, { "ob_id": 4825, "explanation": "Model simulations were checked by co-authors during the simulation process.The CDDS conversion package used to produce the files contains several in built data quality checks.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-11-18" }, { "ob_id": 4837, "explanation": "The unbiased root mean square error of snow cover fraction adapted from the approach of Salminen et al. (2018) is added as uncertainty layer in each product. The SLSTR based SCFG products are matching the CCI data standards version 2.3, released in July 2021. For more information on data quality, see the Snow_cci documentation.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-11-26" }, { "ob_id": 4838, "explanation": "The unbiased root mean square error of snow cover fraction adapted from the approach of Salminen et al. (2018) is added as uncertainty layer in each product. The SLSTR based SCFV products are matching the CCI data standards version 2.3, released in July 2021. For more information on data quality, see the Snow_cci documentation.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-11-26" }, { "ob_id": 4839, "explanation": "NA", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-11-28" }, { "ob_id": 4840, "explanation": "CMORised dataset following ODS2.5 and latest CF Conventions 1.12", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-11-28" }, { "ob_id": 4841, "explanation": "The model has been evaluated against local air quality sites (i.e., airport, roadside and urban background sites).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-11-29" }, { "ob_id": 4842, "explanation": "The model has been evaluated against local air quality sites (i.e., airport, roadside and urban background sites).", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-11-29" }, { "ob_id": 4843, "explanation": "Dataset post-processed using CMOR inline with ODS2.6 and CF Conventions 1.12", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-05" }, { "ob_id": 4844, "explanation": "Dataset post-processed using CMOR 3.10, as per ODS2.6 and CF conventions 1.12 by the CMIP IPO", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-05" }, { "ob_id": 4846, "explanation": "Product validation has been carried out as described in the paper Rodriguez-Veiga et al, 2025.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-08" }, { "ob_id": 4847, "explanation": "This is a prototype. The information in this product is high-quality and has been subject to a rigorous quality assurance process. However, the form of the product and how it is published are subject to change.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-11" }, { "ob_id": 4848, "explanation": "Any quality standards that were used in the collection of this data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-12" }, { "ob_id": 4849, "explanation": "This is a prototype. The information in this product is high-quality and has been subject to a rigorous quality assurance process. However, the form of the product and how it is published are subject to change.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-15" }, { "ob_id": 4850, "explanation": "The wave data generated using the SWAN model were validated against two independent data sources, focusing on the main variables that characterize wave conditions: significant wave height (Hs), peak wave period (Tp), and wave direction. Validation was performed for both mean conditions and extreme values following established practices in wave model evaluation.\r\n\r\nFirst, the SWAN outputs were compared with wave parameters from the ERA5 reanalysis, enabling a spatially consistent assessment across the European Atlantic and North Atlantic domains. Extreme wave conditions were assessed by comparing the 90th, 95th, and 99th percentiles derived from the model simulations and the ERA5 dataset.\r\n\r\nSecond, the model results were validated against in-situ observations from wave buoys operated by Puertos del Estado (Spain), the Hydrographic Institute of the Portuguese Navy, and the UK Met Office. These comparisons (mean and extreme values) confirm the reliability of the dataset.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-15" }, { "ob_id": 4851, "explanation": "Data prepared using CMOR 3.10 to CF Conventions 1.12 and ODS2.6", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-17" }, { "ob_id": 4852, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-17" }, { "ob_id": 4853, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-17" }, { "ob_id": 4854, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-17" }, { "ob_id": 4855, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-17" }, { "ob_id": 4856, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-17" }, { "ob_id": 4858, "explanation": "The SL_cci+ XTRACK/ALES product (v3.0) has been produced based on the L2 altimeter algorithms recommended by the SL_cci.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-17" }, { "ob_id": 4859, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-17" }, { "ob_id": 4860, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-17" }, { "ob_id": 4861, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2025-12-17" }, { "ob_id": 4862, "explanation": "Research data - Comments on the quality of the data are available in the data files.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-01-12" }, { "ob_id": 4863, "explanation": "The data are provided as-is with no quality control undertaken by the British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC). The data suppliers have not indicated if any quality control has been undertaken on these data.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "BODC Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-01-14" }, { "ob_id": 4864, "explanation": "None", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-01-20" }, { "ob_id": 4865, "explanation": "Calibration, instrument checking.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-01-20" }, { "ob_id": 4866, "explanation": "Data are as supplied by the project team. No quality information is available", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-01-26" }, { "ob_id": 4867, "explanation": "Data is supplied as-is.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-01-29" }, { "ob_id": 4869, "explanation": "No info", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-02-03" }, { "ob_id": 4870, "explanation": "No quality information known", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-02-05" }, { "ob_id": 4871, "explanation": "ODS2.6 and CF Conventions 1.12", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-02-11" }, { "ob_id": 4873, "explanation": "Satellite output has only been checked for CF convention compliance, otherwise data are as given by the data provider. Data files contain extensive metadata detailing the product.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-03-05" }, { "ob_id": 4875, "explanation": "Model output has been supplied as-is.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-03-11" }, { "ob_id": 4876, "explanation": "Data were collected from the PP1 and processed by the Greenhouse Gas Research Group in RHUL.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "Greenhouse Gas Research Group in RHUL.", "date": "2026-03-12" }, { "ob_id": 4877, "explanation": "Data quality and conformance was performed by the project team.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-03-12" }, { "ob_id": 4878, "explanation": "Data quality and conformance was performed by the project team.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "NERC grant NE/V001787/1", "date": "2026-03-12" }, { "ob_id": 4879, "explanation": "These are estimates and are subject to uncertainty in the SAR data used and the altimetry data that the temporal inundation patterns were validated against.", "passesTest": true, "resultTitle": "CEDA Data Quality Statement", "date": "2026-03-12" } ] }